Justice
Department reinstates forfeiture program that returned seized assets to local
police
ABA
Journal
Posted
Jul 19, 2017 03:30 pm CDT
By
Debra Cassens Weiss
The
U.S. Justice Department has announced it will reinstate a forfeiture program in
which local police departments seize property connected to criminal activity
that violates federal law, and then get to keep up to 80 percent of the
proceeds.
Deputy
Attorney General Rod Rosenstein told reporters Wednesday that new safeguards
will prevent abuses, report the Washington Post, Reuters, BuzzFeed News and the
Washington Examiner. Attorney General Jeff Sessions made the same point in
prepared remarks; the policy directive is here.
Former
Attorney General Eric Holder had mostly eliminated the program, which allows
seizure of property without a criminal conviction.
New
guidelines require local police departments to demonstrate that a property
seizure is justified by probable cause and to provide more training to officers
on asset forfeiture laws. Federal officials will have to quickly send notice to
property owners about the seizures.
When
seized cash totals less than $10,000 additional safeguards may be required.
Unless the U.S. Attorney’s office approves the forfeiture, the property must be
seized under one of these conditions: under a state warrant, incident to
arrest, at the same time contraband is seized, or when the owner or person from
whom the property is seized admits the property comes from criminal activity.
Among
those objecting to the Justice Department’s new policy are the American Civil
Liberties Union and the Institute for Justice.
“Civil
forfeiture is inherently abusive,” Institute for Justice senior attorney
Darpana Sheth said in a statement. “No one should lose his or her property
without being first convicted of a crime, let alone charged with one. The only
safeguard to protect Americans from civil forfeiture is to eliminate its use altogether.
The Department of Justice’s supposed safeguards amount to little more than
window dressing of an otherwise outrageous abuse of power.”
No comments:
Post a Comment